Operating System; Windows 10 64bit: 4, 399: Windows 7 64bit: 2, 307: Windows 8 64bit: 1, 309: debian jessie/sid 64bit. Jul 23, 2014 I started right away, things went smoothly and after some testing I decided last weekend to go public.I call the addon BlenchMark.It's a benchmark for Blender, and my name is Mark (that's why the M is capitalized). It let's you run a benchmark, see your results and upload them to the webiste I made for it.

One of the most important hardware components inside your computer is obviously the drive that holds the operating system. If you have Windows installed on a slow hard drive, it doesn’t matter how powerful the other components like CPU and memory are, the system will boot slower, load programs more slowly, and lag quite badly while multitasking.

Blender Open Data is a platform to collect, display and query the results of hardware and software performance tests - provided by the public.

This is a reason why high performance hard drives and especially SSD’s are so popular these days. It’s because upgrading just that one part can breath new life into a computer and make it feel a lot more snappy to use. The actual hard disk or SSD performance under Windows is determined by several factors so how do you know if your drive is performing well, needs tweaking or is even holding the system back?

Thankfully, the internet is full of websites to show you how well nearly every drive around can perform. Also, loads of programs are available that can give your hardware a performance test to see how well it’s doing. There are many paid suites around like PCMark or Passmark that can test the whole system, but here we list for you 10 free tools that are specifically designed for testing the performance of hard drives and SSD drives.

All tools were tested on Windows 10 64-bit and are also compatible with Windows 7 and 8.

1. CrystalDiskMark

This is a very popular storage benchmarking tool because it’s versatile and can produce good results for just about everything from USB drives, to memory cards, RAMDisks, SSD drives and mechanical hard drives. CrystalDiskMark is very easy to operate too, just set the test size between 50MB and 4GB, the drive to test and the number of passes to run. More passes obviously should produce more accurate results.

Then click All to run a full test or any individual colored buttons below to run single tests. A useful extra option for SSD drives is whether to fill the test data randomly or with 0’s or 1’s. This will affect the results on drives with hardware compression such as those with Sandforce controllers. Portable, installer and custom skin versions are available.

Download CrystalDiskMark

2. ATTO Disk Benchmark

ATTO Disk Benchmark is a popular portable tool used by many hardware review websites and is also recommended by manufacturers such as Corsair to run speed tests on SSD drives. All the tests are sequential and are taken for read and write operations using block sizes of 512 bytes up to 64MB. A test file length of between 64KB and 32GB is also available, both are selectable from drop down menus.

Leaving Direct I/O enabled will rule out odd results due to any system caching. An I/O size of over a couple of Megabytes will produce virtually the same scores so probably isn’t needed for many users. Results can be saved out and loaded again at a later time. A look around the internet will likely find someone else who has posted ATTO results for similar hardware to your own.

Download ATTO Disk Benchmark (via Softpedia, the official site requires filling a form)

3. AS SSD Benchmark

AS SSD looks a bit like CrystalDiskMark and is designed primarily to benchmark SSD drives. It is another popular tool being used by hardware sites such as AnandTech’s SSD benchmark charts (which also includes ATTO) to show their results. The program uses incompressible data so some SSD’s will show much lower scores than usual if they compress their data.

Sequential and 4KB read and write scores will be shown along with access times and a final general overall score. The results can be changed to IOPS if you prefer from the View menu. A couple of useful additional benchmarks are available in the Tools menu like a Copy benchmark which simulates copying an ISO, game and a program, and also a read/write compression benchmark. AS SSD is also completely portable.

Download AS SSD Benchmark(website is in German, download link at bottom)

4. Anvil’s Storage Utilities

For an SSD or hard drive benchmark and test utility that really puts drives through their paces, they don’t come much more comprehensive than Anvil’s Storage Utilities. While being able to perform a complete read and write test using sequential and random operations, it displays a full set of results including response time, speed in MB/s and also IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second).

A total combined read/write score is shown in the yellow box. Also included are 3 extra IOPS tests, an endurance testing function and the ability in the settings to alter the amount of compression to use on the test file. More functions like a system information tab and a screenshot saver round off an impressive tool. Anvil’s Storage Utilities doesn’t seem to be developed anymore and the last version is from 2014.

Download Anvil’s Storage Utilities

5. HD Tune

HD Tune is probably the most well known hard disc drive benchmarking and diagnostic utility and will likely be in every tech users USB toolkit. The free version 2.55 is getting old now having not been updated since 2008 and might have minor issues with some of the latest hard drive models. Some functions like error checking and benchmarking should still work fine.

After a test, the benchmark result graph will show the minimum, maximum and average read speed along with the average access time in milliseconds and the burst rate. The block size can be changed in the options from 512 bytes up to 8MB and a slider can move between faster less accurate or slower more accurate test speeds.

Download HD Tune

12Next › View All

You might also like:

8 Free Tools to Test Read and Write Speed of USB Flash Drives5 Free Tools to Check and Test USB Flash Drives13 Free RAM Disk Tools Benchmarked for Read and Write Speed5 Sites to Compare CPU Speed and Performance from Benchmarks ReportsMozilla Firefox 64-bit Performance Compared to 32-bit

Is there a bootable type of SSD benchmark software? I find that windows based softwares are inconsistent.

Reply

Pretty much all drive reviewers I’ve seen use Windows based tools so they can’t be that inconsistent. I think it could be more to do with what’s running on your system, such as antivirus, Windows updates/tasks, or third party software doing things in the background while a disk test is running.

I don’t recall ever seeing a disk benchmark software that doesn’t require a full OS to run, whether it’s Windows or Linux. Obviously bootable Live CDs still run an OS although it will usually be stripped down to a large degree.

Reply

Hello, i am looking for a Hard Disk/Drive utility that can scan and “repair” weak sectors.
Also interested to know if there is a tool that scan a hard drive surface from back to front and also randomly perhaps?

Thanks
James

Reply

Bad sectors are usually a sign that your drive is starting to fail. If you have a high number of bad or pending sectors it is highly recommended that you replace the drive rather than attempt to repair it.

WD Data Lifeguard is a free disk diagnostic tool from Western Digital. It can run a “basic test” (checking SMART info), an “extended test” (full scan that locates bad sectors), or completely wipe the drive.

If bad sectors are found during an extended test, you will be given an option to attempt to repair these sectors. However, like I said above, it is recommended that you replace a failing drive.

You can also use CrystalDiskInfo (from the makers of CrystalDiskMark) to display SMART information and monitor drive health in real time. CDI once saved me from having to pay for expensive data recovery by showing an alarm for pending sectors before my drive died 2 days later.

Reply

HD Tach cannot run on my Windows 7 64bit system, it says that only could be run on Win2K or WinXP.

Reply

Read the article again and you will see that it does work and what you need to do to get it to work.

Reply

Here is a simple disk benchmark tool written in Java I’ve been working on. Would appreciate any feedback anyone is willing to provide. Best wishes,
sourceforge.net/projects/jdiskmark/

Reply

I’ve written a simplistic tool in Python to benchmark HDDs and SSDs. It is completely open-source and now in alpha stage, though you already could use it, and if interested, participate in development.
Here’s the link: github.com/thodnev/MonkeyTest

Reply

CrystalDiskMark installs a hidden program on your computer that forces your browser to use a particular search engine.

Reply

That’s because you are downloading the version with ads, get the one without ads to not have it install opencandy adware.

Reply

So how do you know which version your are downloading? With or without ads?

Reply

In fact, there is no version with ads any more, the author removed opencandy earlier in 2016.

Reply

Thanks for the heads up,
I was looking to download and use CrystalDiskMark, but not now!!

Reply

Why are you taking notice of a 3 year old comment when a newer comment is telling you that problem doesn’t exist anymore and hasn’t existed since 2016??

Reply

@ relcocq
SSD drives aren’t effected by fragmented disk, so no shouldn’t effect the results
You should never run de-frag programs on a SSD, ever.

Reply

Yes and no. Defrag on a HDD, from Win 7+, it run Optimize, which is the trim command. This is very important. Why? simple.

An HDD is seperate into block and then into pages. It can only do 3 operations on block: Read, Write and Erase. It cannot overwrite like a hard disk. But it function the same way: When you delete something, it marks the pages related to these data as available, but not empty. A problem though, on page, it can only do Read and Write, not erase.

When you have to erase a page because you run out of empty page, the ssd controller must copy all the good page in cache from the block (Read action + write action in the SSD cache), erase the block so all pages are empty and write back the good page from the cache. This operation take time and this is way your SSD speed degrate with usage.

Thus, in the early days of SSD, Trim appeared to fix this problem. When Trim is run, it does the operation above on all needed block and pages, thus leaving the SSD only with good and empty pages. This process does add some wear on the drive, but very little.

With time, OS and controller have implemented various way to bypass this problem, like doing the trim action on each erase, never leaving bad pages.

More and reference at: anandtech.com/show/2738/8

Reply

I did not see Hard Disk Sentential among your programs. I’ve been using it for years now.
3 years back it told me the bad sectors of the 750GB hard disk in my Dell 545 Inspiron had increased and its performance had dropped to 80%.
The system was still under warranty so I contacted Dell. After a lengthy phone call discussing the problem, they a sent a technician out. After 90 minutes, he agreed the drive was problematic, and gave me a 1TB replacement drive.
I installed the new drive, made it the boot and moved everything important over to it.
I made the 750GB drive a secondary just to see how long it might last. About one week later it failed.
I am sure those programs you list are great but I am thankful Hard Disk Sentential was recommended to me and have it on all of our computers.

Reply

Hard Disk Sentinel is a completely different type of software and is not a tool specifically for bench marking your drives.

Benchmark Pc

Besides, it isn’t even free and this article is specifically about free software for the job.

Benchmarking

Reply

Installed HD Tach on Win 8. It will not run and displays a message that it will only run 2000 or XP.

Reply

Go to the Simpli Software program files folder and run the hdtach.exe in Windows XP compatibility mode, works fine then.

Reply

Thanks Ray!!!

Reply

Has anyone considered whether or not a fragmented disk would effect the results?
I would think so.
Rob.

Reply

Blenchmark

Has Bare Feats helped you? How about donating to Bare Feats? feed

Mac Blender Benchmark: CPUs only versus GPUs only Posted February 19th, 2016 by rob-ART morgan, mad scientist Updated March 2nd, 2016 with better sample and 12-core tower We are always looking for new and better benchmarks. BLENDER got our attention because, like OctaneRender, it lets you choose the GPU as the Compute Device but, unlike OctaneRender, it 'speaks' both OpenCL and CUDA. BLENDERusing GPU(s) only With Compute Device set to OpenCL or CUDA, Blender is forced to use one or more GPU for rendering. We chose the Dual BMW Benchmark (GPU version; 256x256 Tiles). (LOWEST time in seconds = FASTEST) GPU GRAPH LEGEND GeForce GTX 980x2 = 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz 6-Core Xeon; Dual EVGA GeForce GTX 980 GPUs (requires NVIDIA web driver) GeForce GTX 980 = 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz 6-Core Xeon; Single EVGA GeForce GTX 980 GPU (requires NVIDIA web driver) FireProD700x2 = 'late 2013' Mac Pro 3.0GHz 8-Core Xeon; Dual FirePro D700 GPUs RadeonHD 7950x2 = 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz 6-Core Xeon; Dual Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 GPUs FireProD700 = 'late 2013' Mac Pro 3.0GHz 8-Core Xeon; Single FirePro D700 GPU Radeon R9 M395X = 'early 2015' iMac 5K 4.0GHz Quad-Core i7; Single AMD Radeon R9 M395X GPU Radeon HD 7950 = 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz 6-Core Xeon; Single Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 GPU BLENDER using CPU(s) only Compute Device set to 'None' forces your Mac to render using the CPU(s) only. We rendered the Dual BMW Benchmark (CPU version; 32x32 Tiles). (LOWEST time in seconds = FASTEST) CPU GRAPH LEGEND cMP 12c = 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz 12-core Xeon (CPU tray courtesy of OWC) nMP 8c = 'late 2013' Mac Pro 3.0GHz 8-Core Xeon iMac 4c = 'early 2015' iMac 5K 4.0GHz Quad-Core i7 cMP 6c = 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz 6-Core Xeon WHAT DID WE LEARN? If you have a strong GPU (or a pair of strong GPUs), you can render Blender projects as fast or faster than a multi-core CPU. To get the most out of either, you must tweak the tile setting in performance preferences. CPU rendering is faster with smaller tiles (32x32 for example) and GPU rendering is faster with larger tiles (256x256 for example). The main downside of dual high-end GPUs in the 2010 Mac Pro is that the second GPU requires an auxiliary power supply. Life is simpler if you go with a really strong single GPU like the NVIDIA GTX 980 Ti -- although it (along with other non-standard NVIDIA Maxwell class GPUs) requires a web based driver from NVIDIA designed for the Quadro K5000 for Mac. (Our ASUS STRIX GeForce GTX 980 Ti OC 'died' so we were not able render the Dual BMW Benchmark Sample Scene for the updated page. It should render 15% faster than the single 980.) RELATED ARTICLES ON BAREFEATS Comments? Suggestions? Feel free to email me, Follow me on Twitter @barefeats WHERE TO BUY MACS and OTHER APPLE products: USA readers can help us earn a commission by using this Apple Store USA link or by clicking on any Apple display ad. Live outside the USA? No problem. We are affiliated with these Apple Stores: OTHER SOURCES FOR MACS PowerMax not only sells new and used Macs, but will give you a generous trade-in offer on your old Mac. Other World Computing has a Used Mac Store. WHERE TO BUY FACTORY REFURBISHED MACS Apple Store USA has refurbished Macs with 12 month warranty that can be extended to 36 months with AppleCare. Pay attention to the GPU it comes with. WHERE TO BUY GRAPHICS CARDS AND 5K DISPLAYS B&H Photo sells the GeForce GTX 980 Ti, Dell 5K display, and other Apple compatible products. MacVidCards sells various models of NVIDIA GPUs modified to display Apple startup screen. Has Bare Feats helped you? How about helping Bare Feats? copyright 2016 Rob Art Morgan 'BARE facts on Macintosh speed FEATS' FEEDBACK or QUESTIONS?

INDEX of recent articles or... index, sitemap, advanced

Blenchmark Start Benchmark